14.                BREAKING BARRIERS  IN THE FAMILY
        
                                     Eph. 5:21-25;  Gen. 2:18-22

                                                             Rachel Bagh

Introduction:
    Our  task will be
 to try to understand  the  status and roles  of women in the family, and  to spell out  some of  the barriers to women's fulfillment of those roles.  As we attempt to interpret the Biblical understanding of the family and of women's roles, we are faced with several difficulties.

1.    The first relates to interpretation of the Bible itself, and the authority it holds for us.  We have already given considerable attention to this topic, especially within the first section of our Bible studies, but we will raise some of these issues again here.

2.    The second difficulty relates to the particular religio-cultural and socio-economic contexts within which families are set, and how those values and structures impact the various family members in different ways and shape their identities and expectations of themselves and of others.
    Indian culture is shaped by the dominant Hindu culture, even for Christians and other minority communities. That culture is basically patriarchal, that is, males are given priority, they are assumed to be superior, and to have the right to rule over women, children, and even over males of lower social and economic status.  However, our culture is also fast changing, under the impact of the forces of globalization and modernization, and hence our value systems, family patterns, and our identities are in a state of transition.  Some of these changes are positive, like opportunities for education, new skills and employment for women; others may cause more stress and suffering for women, such as increasing abuse and violence in the home and on the streets. 
    Families are social institutions which are made by God to fulfill certain purposes in this world.  Thus both husbands and wives, who are the main pillars of the family, need to understand their roles and responsibilities, so that they can fulfill those purposes.  This holds true for all families, whatever their religious faith or no faith.
    For the purposes of this study, however, we will confine ourselves to undertaking a collective search within the Biblical tradition for an understanding of the roles of women within the family.
    Hence it is important to recognize that there are two views put forward in the Bible regarding the position of women in the home and family, one which accepts the man as the authority figure, while the woman is subordinate, the second which rejects the dominance of the male and advocates equality for both husband and wife.  The understanding of the roles and relations of man and woman, in turn, are dependent upon the understanding of their positions in the order of creation.
    Unfortunately, Biblical passages are often misused and misinterpreted in isolation, in order to justify the arguments of their advocates.   Thus, for many, Biblical references like Genesis 2:18-25 (story of the creation) and Gen 3:16 (husband... shall rule over you), and Eph 5:21-25 and its parallel "household codes," 1 Peter 3:1-8 and Col. 3:15-19, are familiar portions used to sanction the superiority of the husband and the inferiority of the wife, which has created or reinforced oppressive structures in families.  This understanding is further justified by arguing that Eve was created after Adam but was first to yield to temptation and to lead Adam into temptation as well, thereby causing the fall of humanity.  Even Paul in Corinthians    puts forward this argument.
     These Biblical interpreters conveniently ignore Paul's forceful emphasis on both freedom and equality which we experience in Christ, see especially Gal. 3:28, "There is no longer Jew or Greek, there is no longer slave or free, there is no longer male and female, for all of you are one in Christ Jesus."  They choose to overlook Gen. 1:27, where male and female are created - at the same time and as equals- in the image of God, in favor of the second account of creation in Gen. 2-3.
    Therefore, in order to get a clear understanding, we need to turn to a careful study and interpretation of scripture.

Read together Ephesians 5:21-25.
    In Ephesians, chaps 4-6, Paul gives details on how Christians, especially the new converts, should live as believers.  In 5:21, he summarizes his instructions in a decisive statement, "Be subject to one another out of reverence for Christ."  The word `subject' is a translation of the Greek word  hypotasso, -- hypo=ruler, tasso=to arrange.  It is best translated as `relate yourselves to,' or `adjust to' one another out of reverence...  It shows a universal, reciprocal and mutual relationship--that husbands should `be subject to' or respond to the needs of their wives, and wives should `be subject to' or respond to the needs of their husbands `out of reverence for Christ.'
    Thus we gather that even in this passage, where women are instructed to `be subject to' or `submit to' their husbands (v. 22 ) the woman is not inferior to man, to be ruled willfully.  As Paul says, ".... there is neither male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus" (Gal. 3:28).  Her submission to her husband is a voluntary act, as done unto the Lord.  A similar command is given to husbands, to love their wives, to reduce the oppression.  I believe that God's commands were not meant to increase the oppression either in the immediate context of the Bible at that time, or in the present day situation.  His commands are rather to rescue women from an oppressive structure.
    Many argue that Paul has increased the oppression of women by asking them "to be silent" or to be subordinate under the husband's authority.
    God's word never brings destruction to anyone in any situation.  His word, in fact, saves people and gives life to people.  We need to understand and interpret God's word in the light of God’s nature, total plan, and concern for human beings in the past, present, and future.
    Even though the Jewish people were the direct recipients of God's word, they were humans in their own social setting, which was patriarchal in both social and religious dimensions.  The Old Testament reflects the subservient roles of women -- e.g. Sarah, Rachel, Rebecca, Leah.  OT history portrays other incidents too, which are very adverse to women, e.g. Hagar's rejection by Abraham and Sarah, the rapes of Dinah and Bathsheba.  There are other Old Testament examples of women who challenged the authority of their husbands -- Vashti and Abigail, or who functioned independently, e.g. Shiprah and Puah, Jael, Deborah, Huldah.  Though a wife was usually considered as a husband's possession (Ex. 20:17), she was by no means a husband's slave (Deut. 21:14).
    Let us look at the barriers within the family which inhibit the fulfillment of women's roles:

1.    Indian Socio-Cultural Expectations: 
    Today the term "helper" (used to refer to the woman in Gen. 2:18) has come to mean "servant."  The woman is considered as man's property or a repository of his honor.  The male members of the family do not see her as an independent human being.  Any attempt on her part at independent decision making is seen as a blot on the family honor and status quo.  For example, in many parts of rural India, women are not allowed to go out except when their husbands ask them to do so.  Without the husband's or in-law's permission she is not allowed to go to her parental home.  Many mothers-in-law expect their daughters-in-law to take their permission even to go out with their own husbands.  Due to the patriarchal culture and traditions of our country, a woman is considered as a family slave.  Her function is to bear and raise the children, to do the household chores, and please her family members.  She is expected to docilely accept violence to her mind, body, and spirit.

2.    Male Headship and Female Subordination: 
    Gen. 2:18-22, 1 Cor 11:3, and Eph. 5:22-24 are interpreted to advocate the superiority of the man's position in relation to the wife's position.  Headship and subordination are seen within the framework of a patriarchal system.  This, in turn, has led to the reinforcing of the traditional Indian understanding of woman's role which is severely restrictive, oppressive, and stifling.  The result is a poor self-image which in turn hinders a woman to achieve her potential as a wife and mother, as the Bible teaches.
    However, it is not only the patriarchal system which is to blame, but also a faulty understanding of the Biblical concepts of headship, partnership, and subordination.  Keeping such a background in mind, the woman's role as wife and mother becomes extremely crucial for an Indian Christian woman.  The view that God created both man and women equal and in God's image needs to be affirmed, to challenge this distortion.

3.    The Joint Family System: 
    The Biblical injunction in Gen. 2:24 is "Therefore a man leaves his father and mother and cleaves to his wife, and they become one flesh."  However, in the Indian context we have the joint family system, which is mostly patriarchal and patrilineal in nature.  In my opinion, this is the greatest barrier for Christian women to fulfill their biblical roles.  It is the wife who generally leaves her family and joins her husband's family.  Socially, she is under the authority of her mother-in-law.  Her husband exercises authority over her, reinforced by the authority of his family.  Thus, a woman struggles between two authorities.  Her loyalty and obedience to God's authority is superseded by the patriarchal authorities. 
    Secondly, whether a woman lives in a rural or urban setting, in a joint family she is part of a network of relationships which includes grandparents, children, in-laws and other relatives.  It hinders the intimate relationship between husband and wife which the scripture sees as essential in marriage.  She does not experience that love from her husband which should nourish and cherish her whole personality.  Thus, the household work, rearing of children, caring for her husband and others become burdens of the wife.

Conclusion:
    The above three points clearly indicate how the Bible is used to reinforce the traditional understandings and role models of how the relationship between husband and wife, male and female, should be.  But it has also presented a biblical understanding of equality between husband and wife.
    There is an urgent need to educate our members, both women and men, to understand male - female relationships, as well as the scriptures in the right way.  There is also an urgent need to provide space for couples to interact, share,  and sort out their problems of interpersonal relationships.  Programs oriented towards this should be promoted. 
    By re-reading the Biblical passsages with a new perspective, pastors, church leaders, and couples themselves may be helped to understand the marriage relationship as a partnership, sharing, encouraging and upbuilding one another, out of reverence for Christ.

Questions for Discussion:

1.    How do you understand your role in the family?
2.    What is your understanding of submission and     subordinate role of a wife?  Has this bible study     given you new insights?
3.    Discuss barriers inhibiting women and men from     discovering new roles and relationships in daily life     in your context.
4.    Suggests ways to overcome these barriers.